Rotherham United - RUFC - League Statement
UK time is: 16:19:19
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

RUFC - League Statement

The Football League have met today to consider the current circumstances of the clubs that are in administration - one of these being Rotherham United.

The statement on the Football League Official Board is:

Preliminary information was received from a new company that wishes to take Rotherham United's place in League Two.

The new company has not yet submitted a complete application to The League, although it has indicated that it would wish to play the club's matches at the Don Valley Stadium in Sheffield.

To assist the new company in completing its application, the Board decided to remind it that a club is ordinarily required to play its matches in its existing town. Clubs can be permitted to play in other locations on a temporary basis while a new ground is being built or developed.

In Rotherham United's case, if the new company were to confirm an application to play elsewhere on a temporary basis then before giving permission the Board would require it to agree to return to Rotherham within a period of four years and also to lodge an irrevocable bond of 750,000.

The new company is also reminded that all football creditors must be paid in full. In Rotherham's case, the Board was told that this includes an outstanding debt to the Football Stadia Improvement Fund.

The new company would also be required to determine its proposed course of action before the start of the coming season. In the event that the Board receives a complete application from the new company it reserves the right to impose further conditions.

With regards the other two clubs - Bournemouth - the board decided to defer discussions until all the paper work had been handed in
Luton - It looks like they could be given a 20 points deduction

Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Herringthorpe  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday July 10 2008

Time: 4:18PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
Erm - HELP????
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 16:46:00

And I always thought Sheffield was in Rotherham lol!!!
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 17:30:00

That's an idea, tc - do you think it would be cheaper to ask the powers who be to move the boundary a bit than paying the bond to the FL?
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 17:39:00

Mexbro miller
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 17:55:00

This is quite a BIG thing though, isn't it, Mex!
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 18:11:00

no not really. on a scale of 1-10 over the past 30years it is quite smaill
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 18:49:00

So, 4eva, do you think the rest of us are taking this out of all proportion? (It would be good if you said 'yes, caz, of course you are. It's all going to be fine'!)
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 18:52:00

it is not all going to be fine BUT we will surpass it, we have had darker times- at present the skies are jus't grey
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 19:03:00

You know the Dr Who when all the stars went out? It feels a bit like that to me
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 19:29:00

So the new people have to find 750,000 and promise to have a new ground built in Rotherham. That sounds a tall order to me. Good luck.
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 20:36:00

Didn't do that to Sam Hamman or the Franchise did they Rotherham is a lot clser to Sheffield than Wimbledon is to Crystal palace.
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 20:51:00

Yes but we aren't a 'big' team! And aren't Spurs wanting to use a different ground while White Hart Lane is being done up?
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 23:23:00

Slightly different in the case of Tottenham theirs is a planned improvement and they are returning to the stadium. Rotherham will be looking to move grounds altogether. BTW was the football stadia improvement fund money used on that unfinished stand at Millmoor?
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 23:50:00

I think it must have been Dean1. I can't think of any other improvement we nearly made! The council have actually earmarked a site for the new stadium - and the idea was that we would be there in four years time. But they have gone a bit quiet lately
Report Abuse
10/07/2008 23:55:00

a very tall order in deed for anyone taking over...big investment just to seeemingly survive never mind investing in the team....good luck with this.............
Report Abuse
14/07/2008 12:29:00


Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Rotherham United Articles

RUFC - Black Praises Wonder Strike (Saturday October 3 2015)

RUFC - Caretaker Pleased With Players (Saturday October 3 2015)

Millers Lose In Front Of TV Cameras (Friday October 2 2015)

Millers v Clarets (Friday October 2 2015)

RUFC - Head-to-Head v Burnley (Thursday October 1 2015)

Archived Rotherham United Articles

List All Vital Rotherham Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
18. Charlton 9 2 3 4 -3 9
19. MK Dons 10 2 2 6 -5 8
20. Brentford 10 2 2 6 -7 8
21. Rotherham 10 2 2 6 -7 8
22. Bolton 10 1 5 4 -7 8
23. Preston 10 1 4 5 -6 7
24. Bristol City 10 1 4 5 -8 7

Rotherham United  Fixtures (view all)

Breaking League News

Vital Report - Brighton 1-1 Cardiff City
Brighton : 04/10/2015 14:44:01
Charlton 2 Fulham 2
Fulham : 04/10/2015 14:08:00
Fulham : 04/10/2015 13:56:00
Charlton : 04/10/2015 13:54:00
Cotterill: 'We Desperately Needed That Win'
Bristol City : 04/10/2015 12:00:01

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Of the following candidates who would you like to be the next Millers Manager
Suggested By:  
Stuart Gray 4%
Neil Redfearn 6%
Darren Ferguson 2%
Ian Holloway 9%
Neil Warnock 4%
Phil Parkinson 0%
Brian McDermott 2%
Nigel Pearson 15%
Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink 36%
Paul Hurst 2%
Chris Wilder 0%
Billy Russell 0%
Gareth Ainsworth 2%
Other 18%