UK time is: 15:53:36
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

RUFC - Reserves Routed

Rotherham United Reserves 0 Hartlepool Reserves 5

Rotherham United lost this afternoon to a lively Hartlepool at Roundwood with James Poole getting four of the five goals.

The Millers started the livelier with both Chris Holroyd and Ollie Banks having shots at goal but were outdone by Poole when he intercepted a pass in midfield and found himself one on one with Conrad Logan in the Millers` goal to score. While the Millers were still reeling from that, Poole got the better of trialist Alassane N`Diaye and shot from distance seeing the ball go in off the post for his second. At the other end Marcus Marshall, playing at right-back, got a good ball in to Tom Foltyn-Brown but his header went wide. On thirty-seven minutes Poole got his hat-trick after trying to lob Logan, the 'keeper parried the ball out and twenty-one year old was there to finish with an overhead kick that wouldn`t have looked out of place on Match of the Day.

Once again the Millers came out at half-time the better side with Holroyd having a couple of shots at goal. On the hour Jordan Richards got in a good ball to Poole who lobbed Logan for his and Hartlepool`s fourth. Ten minutes later, Banks` free-kick made Liam Mooney in the visitors goal work and he parried it out to a lurking Holroyd but the striker couldn`t quite get it right. Warne and Luke Foster also had shots at goal and Phil Woods, on for Marshall, saw his shot hit the post and go to safety. But James Brown sealed the win with a goal to make it five-nil meaning Hartlepool have scored fourteen goals in their last three games.

Teams
Millers
Logan
Marshall (Woods)
Royles
Foster
N`Diaye (Hart)
Hart
Warne
Banks
Holroyd
Foltyn-Brown (Beedham)
Rose

Subs not used - Travis, Thompson

Hartlepool
Mooney
Wright
Johnson
Rutherford (Snaith)
Holden (Jones)
Richards
Haslam
Baldwin
Luscombe
Poole (James)
Brown

Subs not used - Buddle, Tuck

Join The Vital Debate

Don`t forget, you can also catch Vital Rotherham on Facebook and Twitter!

Vital Rotherham on: facebook

Vital Rotherham on: twitter




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Herringthorpe  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday October 10 2011

Time: 6:35PM

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Rotherham United Articles

Stats: Swansea City v Rotherham United (Wednesday August 27 2014)

RUFC - Sadler Injury (Wednesday August 27 2014)

RUFC - Wordsworth 'It Was Hard Work' (Tuesday August 26 2014)

Millers v Swans Preview (Tuesday August 26 2014)

RUFC - Head-to-Head v Swansea (Monday August 25 2014)

RUFC - Ref Watch v Swansea City (Monday August 25 2014)

Archived Rotherham United Articles

List All Vital Rotherham Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. rybel_b 1235
2. herringthorpe 927
3. sixpence 569
4. miller4life 287
5. mos60 80
6. mvmiller 37
7. Millie Miller 30
8. nogginthenog 27
9. nearlyataff 20
10. axholme 20

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Rotherham 1 - 0 Wolves
Rotherham 0 - 2 Watford
Millwall 0 - 1 Rotherham
Derby County 1 - 0 Rotherham

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
11. Bournemouth 4 2 0 2 3 6
12. Middlesbrough 4 2 0 2 1 6
13. Brighton 4 2 0 2 1 6
14. Rotherham 4 2 0 2 -1 6
15. Brentford 4 1 2 1 0 5
16. Birmingham 4 1 2 1 -1 5
17. Ipswich 4 1 1 2 -1 4

Breaking League News

RUFC - View From The Opposition - Swansea City
Rotherham : 27/08/2014 15:49:00
Rotherham : 27/08/2014 15:25:00
Reading : 27/08/2014 14:19:00
Meet The Ref - Latics v Birmingham - David Webb
Wigan : 27/08/2014 13:20:00
Why the Ruiz Deal Was Called Off!
Fulham : 27/08/2014 12:59:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Capital One Cup - If you don't want it seeded would you like it 'regionalised'?
Suggested By:  
No I wouldn't like that 11%
Yes that would be a better idea 65%
Leave it as it is 24%